Neuroplastic Pain Institute — how chronic pain recovery works
← Back to Insights

How Chronic Pain Recovery Actually Works

July 31, 2026 · Aaron Jensen, M.A., R.Psych.

If you have read the earlier pieces in this series — on FEAR, PANIC/GRIEF, and suppressed RAGE — you have a picture of how neuroplastic symptoms are generated through the miscalibration of the brain’s protective systems. Ordinary stress or ordinary sensation is being read as more dangerous than it is. Symptoms arise as the brain’s output of what it takes to be a genuine threat.

In this Insights article, I use the word sensitization to describe the calibration of your brain’s threat appraisal system and its tendency to appraise ordinary situations as calling for protection. Sensitization is malleable rather than static, where each time a response pattern runs, the calibration is updated. Which is precisely why there is something to work with.

The natural next question is: what do we actually do about it?

The good news is that the answer isn’t one thing. There are three distinct moments in the cycle of sensitization where recovery can be worked with — three points at which functional change can occur — and each of them does something unique.

Below is a brief description of each followed with an example from clinical experience or from my own life.

The stress response

The first moment is where stress arrives. Because the brain’s sensitization is continuously updated by what passes through it, changing how the nervous system meets ordinary stress shifts the calibration itself. Many people with chronic pain and symptoms report that during times in life when stress is lifted — when on vacation or doing something enjoyable — their symptoms also dissipate. And the natural thought emerges from these experiences: if only I could remove myself from life stress, I wouldn’t have to live with the pain. Unfortunately, life is not like that. We come home from vacation and the old stressors are still there. So when we work at the level of the stress response, we aim to increase the resilience of the nervous system so that it can calibrate life stressors differently.

In my early twenties I was struggling more with chronic symptoms than I am now, and I had found the philosophical writings of Zen Buddhism compelling. I remember reading Katsuki Sekida’s Zen Training, which among other things describes the method of Zen sitting meditation and its use of diaphragmatic breathing. Before I took up Tai Chi Chuan, I effectively practiced diaphragmatic breathing and sitting meditation together.

The thing with meditation is that it takes time to feel the benefits: the stilling of the mind, and the drifting away of habitual mental and physical noise. But the diaphragmatic breathing has an immediate soothing effect on the nervous system. In my recollection, the time I spent practicing diaphragmatic breathing shifted my automatic responses to stress — from the quality of urgent reaction to patient waiting. I reconditioned my response pattern and learned to first observe the stimulus, then practice several cycles of diaphragmatic breathing, and then reassess the sense of automatic urgency that my nervous system had become habituated to.

The effects of this simple practice can be quite profound. The brain learns — through the simple act of breathing — that there are other possibilities available for thought and action than the automatic escalations the mind has habitually followed. Each time an ordinary stress arrives and is met with breath rather than escalation, the sensitized calibration is subtly updated. Not through any grand insight, but through a small, embodied diversion from the old stress response.

Diaphragmatic breathing is one path. Others include mindfulness practice, structured somatic work, contemplative movement like Tai Chi Chuan, or any consistent practice that teaches the nervous system that stress can be met with pause rather than with reaction. Consistency of practice is what matters the most. It’s the accumulated repetitions of the soothing practice that recalibrates the system.

The emotional completion

The second moment is where the protective system fires — where the FEAR, PANIC/GRIEF, or RAGE circuit runs, and where we can learn to complete emotional circuits and teach the brain that the emotions are okay.

Many clients arrive at chronic pain treatment having spent years avoiding the felt sensations of their emotions. This makes sense. The emotions have felt too big, too dangerous, too shameful, too much. Avoidance was learned as a form of protection. It kept things manageable. It also, unfortunately, kept the underlying protective circuits from completing their process.

In Brainspotting sessions, or in other forms of emotional processing work, clients often discover something important about emotions that they had not understood before: emotions have a beginning, a middle, and an end. Emotions are an embodied process. They arise, they intensify, they peak, and — if given room — they subside on their own.

Emotional processing that augments recovery occurs when we ride the emotional wave rather than jumping off it. When a client stays with the felt sensation of grief, or fear, or rage, without trying to suppress it or fix it or explain it or escape it — the emotion runs its natural course. It completes.

Something specific happens when this occurs enough times. The brain learns, at a level below conscious thought, that the emotions are safe — not as an idea, but in the deeply felt somatic sense that matters. The threat appraisal system learns that it does not need to maintain its urgent protection. It stands down a little. And the next time the emotion arises, it does so with less accompanying protection.

Although emotions will continue to rise again as the conditions of life keep producing them, they arise without the same weight of protective firing. Learned completion of emotions means less resistance to them. And over time, this alleviation of resistance recalibrates the brain’s threat detection. Life can once again fill with more care and joy, as the automatic patterns of fear, grief or anger continue to resolve.

Neuroplastic Pain Institute — how chronic pain recovery works
“Three moments on a single loop — and three real places to look.”

The symptom response

The third moment is the felt sensation of the symptom — pain, fatigue, dizziness, nausea, or anxiety — combined with the common responses to it.

Howard Schubiner has named several of these responses, and they are worth knowing by name as the Fs: fear, fighting against, fixing, focus on, frustration and figuring out. I have added a couple more: flopping, and fleeing. I have even heard clinicians use others like ‘freaking out.’ The point is, these responses prolong sensitization whenever they are invoked automatically. Working with symptom responses replaces the Fs with something different: instead of alarm at the symptom, we can learn to approach the symptom with a steady reassurance that helps the brain’s threat detection ease off. Somatic tracking, which was developed within Pain Reprocessing Therapy, is one method for doing this.

What follows is a composite, drawn from a number of people I have worked with.

Take someone who has lived with irritable bowel syndrome for years. The symptoms — cramping, urgency, discomfort — have been at the centre of their attention for a long time, and their response is always some combination of the Fs: fear that the symptoms will ruin the day, fighting against them, figuring out what they might have eaten, focusing on the sensations to track their intensity. The response is habitual, and until it is named, largely invisible to them.

Over the course of somatic tracking work, that stance can shift. When the symptoms emerge, they learn to bring gentle curiosity rather than fear. They learn to explore the sensation with openness. They learn to notice its texture, its edges, its movement, its shifting qualities without the urgency to make it stop. With practice, they come to apprehend the symptoms with a sense of openness and exploration rather than through the Fs.

This practice reaches the protective circuits underneath, and over time the symptoms often lose their power.

What happened wasn’t magic. Each time the symptom arose and was met with curiosity, the feedback loop stopped adding to the sensitization. The brain, receiving different information about how this symptom was being received, gradually recalibrated.

The research behind this

Each of the three moments described here has an established literature behind it. The capacity of contemplative and breath-based practice to alter autonomic reactivity is well documented in the mindfulness research. The observation that avoiding internal experience maintains distress — and that turning toward it reduces that maintenance — is central to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy’s account of experiential avoidance. The principle that a conditioned reaction can be changed by placing a different response into the gap between stimulus and response is foundational to cognitive-behavioural work. Somatic tracking as a specific method was developed within Pain Reprocessing Therapy. And the family of symptom responses called the Fs comes from Howard Schubiner’s work.

What is added here is the frame that holds these together: that these are not three competing methods but three moments on a single loop, and that sensitization is the running state of that loop rather than a fixed condition inherited from the past. That is my formulation rather than a claim made by any of the researchers above — a distinction worth being clear about.

Where this leaves us

Three moments and three overlapping types of work: all part of the recovery process.

Some clients begin with the stress response — because contemplative practice or breathing work is what they can access first. Some begin with emotional completion — because the underlying feelings are what have been accumulated most heavily. Some begin with the symptom response — because the symptoms are what brought them to treatment, and because the somatic tracking work provides the most direct experience of the neuroplastic model in their own body.

Over time, most recoveries involve all three. A person who has learned to change their stress response often finds themselves better able to stay with emotions when they arise. A person who has done emotional completion work often finds symptoms lose their urgency. A person who has shifted their symptom response often finds it easier to notice emotional material, and maintaining the same curiosity, release the Fs that had been contributing to the symptoms. The three moments feed into each other.

Which door we enter through depends on what is most accessible and most alive. The framework doesn’t prescribe a sequence. It gives us three real places to look, and three real kinds of work to offer.

And this is where recovery actually happens: in the patient, gradual, embodied work of changing what happens at each of the three moments. So which of the three feels most alive to you right now — the stress response, the emotional completion, or the symptom response? That is usually the door. Walking through it is work best done with company, and it is the work I do at the Institute.

Wondering which of the three doors is yours?

Book a free 20-minute consultation. No pressure, no commitment.

Book Free Consultation